Bizarre test for RFK’s Health Department
Bizarre Test for RFK’s Health Department: A Recipe for Disaster
The recent revelation that Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the incoming secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is using a bizarre test to determine who should work in his department has sent shockwaves throughout the scientific community. The test, which can be taken by anyone, consists of 17 pattern recognition questions, followed by word association exercises and a personality quiz. On its surface, this may seem like a harmless tool for gauging personality traits or aptitudes, but upon closer inspection, it reveals itself to be little more than a neo-psychological quackery.
The test asks participants to rank a series of attributes on how they gel with their psychic makeup, including whether they make people feel at ease or neglect their duties. It also presents a list of strange personal insecurities, asking participants to highlight the five that they identify with most. One option reads “I tend to have unstable and intense personal relationships,” while another states “I don’t have that much interest in having sexual experiences with another person.” These questions are not only unscientific but also potentially damaging, as they can lead individuals to question their own mental health or well-being.
The publishing company behind the test, ExamCorp, is run by Jordan Peterson, a psychologist turned right-wing gadfly. This development is particularly concerning given Kennedy’s history of promoting antivax conspiracy theories and his plans to remove fluoride from the water supply. With this test being used to determine who should work in the Health Department, it is likely that we will see more of the same kind of unscientific and harmful policies being implemented.
As one participant noted, “I don’t think we can hammer this point home hard enough. Robert F. Kennedy—a guy who dumped a bear carcass in Central Park—is set to take on a paramount role in the health policy of this country. Helping him round out his staff? Peterson, who is closer to the levers of power than ever before.” This statement highlights the disturbing implications of this development, as it suggests that individuals with questionable qualifications and backgrounds may be given positions of authority within the Health Department.
The use of this bizarre test also raises questions about the potential for discrimination and bias. The test’s reliance on subjective interpretations of personality traits and insecurities can lead to arbitrary and unfair conclusions being drawn about an individual’s suitability for a particular role. This could result in qualified individuals being excluded from positions based on their personal characteristics, rather than their skills or abilities.
Furthermore, the fact that this test is being used to determine who should work in the Health Department is particularly alarming. The Health Department is responsible for overseeing public health policy and ensuring that citizens have access to safe and effective healthcare services. It is imperative that individuals working within this department possess a strong understanding of scientific evidence and a commitment to evidence-based decision-making.
The appointment of RFK Jr. as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has already sparked widespread concern among public health experts and advocates. His history of promoting antivax conspiracy theories and his plans to remove fluoride from the water supply are clear indications that he is not committed to evidence-based decision-making. The use of this bizarre test to determine who should work in the Health Department only serves to further undermine confidence in Kennedy’s ability to lead the department effectively.
In conclusion, the use of a bizarre test to determine who should work in RFK Jr.’s Health Department is a recipe for disaster. This development raises serious concerns about the potential for unscientific and harmful policies being implemented within the department, and highlights the disturbing implications of this appointment. As we move forward, it is essential that we hold Kennedy’s administration accountable for their actions and ensure that they prioritize evidence-based decision-making in all aspects of public health policy.
The Test: A Closer Look
The test itself is a 17-question assessment that asks participants to rank a series of attributes on how they gel with their psychic makeup. This includes questions such as “Do you tend to be highly sensitive or do you have a ‘thick skin’?” and “Are you more of an introvert or extrovert?” The test also presents a list of 20 personal insecurities, asking participants to highlight the five that they identify with most.
Some examples of these questions include:
- I tend to have unstable and intense personal relationships
- I don’t have that much interest in having sexual experiences with another person
- I am more likely to be critical or perfectionistic than others
- I often feel anxious or nervous around new people
These questions are not only unscientific but also potentially damaging, as they can lead individuals to question their own mental health or well-being.
The Publishing Company: ExamCorp
ExamCorp is the publishing company behind the test. It was founded by Jordan Peterson, a psychologist turned right-wing gadfly. Peterson has been known for his extreme views on social issues and his willingness to push boundaries in order to further his own ideology.
Peterson’s involvement with ExamCorp raises serious concerns about the potential for bias and manipulation within the company. His extremist views have already led to controversy and criticism, and it is likely that these biases will be reflected in the products he produces.
The Implications
The use of this bizarre test to determine who should work in RFK Jr.’s Health Department has serious implications for public health policy in the United States. If individuals with questionable qualifications and backgrounds are given positions of authority within the department, it is likely that we will see more of the same kind of unscientific and harmful policies being implemented.
This could include a renewed push for antivax conspiracy theories, or the removal of fluoride from the water supply. Both of these outcomes would have serious consequences for public health in the United States, and highlight the need for evidence-based decision-making within the Health Department.
The Future
As we move forward, it is essential that we hold RFK Jr.’s administration accountable for their actions. This includes ensuring that they prioritize evidence-based decision-making in all aspects of public health policy.
We must also be vigilant in monitoring the activities of ExamCorp and Jordan Peterson, as their involvement with this test raises serious concerns about bias and manipulation within the company. By speaking out against these developments, we can help to ensure that public health policy is guided by scientific evidence rather than extremist ideology.
Iris
December 9, 2024 at 11:35 am
Can we really separate the personal from the professional when it comes to leadership in public health policy?
I’m reminded of a story about the brother of someone who passed away in emergency accommodation, and how his belongings were callously thrown away by the council. It’s a heart-wrenching tale that speaks to the need for compassion and understanding in our institutions.
In the context of Kennedy’s appointment, it’s essential to consider whether his use of this personality test is indicative of a broader disregard for the needs and well-being of those he serves. Is this merely a case of poor judgment, or does it reflect a deeper philosophy that prioritizes personal biases over evidence-based decision-making?
I’d love to hear your thoughts on this matter. Can we really assume that Kennedy’s use of this test is an isolated incident, or are there more concerning signs beneath the surface?
Reference: https://homeideas.go4them.co.uk/lifestyle/councils-callousness-brothers-belongings-thrown-away-after-death-in-emergency-accommodation/
Andres
December 9, 2024 at 9:41 pm
Can we really say with certainty that a test, no matter how bizarre, can’t have any redeeming qualities? Perhaps there’s a way to modify or reinterpret the questions to make them more effective and less damaging?
It’s also worth noting that Jordan Peterson, the publisher behind the test, has been known for his work in psychology and his commitment to helping people understand themselves better. While his views may be extreme on some social issues, shouldn’t we at least consider the possibility that he might have a good reason for creating this test?
Ultimately, I think it’s essential to approach this issue with an open mind and a willingness to listen to different perspectives. By doing so, we can work together to ensure that public health policy is guided by scientific evidence rather than extremist ideology.
Can we find common ground on this issue, or are we doomed to disagree?
Leon Adams
December 28, 2024 at 12:40 pm
just because someone has expertise in an area doesn’t mean they’re not capable of creating a mess. And what about the actual content of this test? Have you even read it? It’s like something out of a bad 1970s self-help book. “Can we really say with certainty that a test, no matter how bizarre, can’t have any redeeming qualities?” Are you serious? This is not just about some abstract concept of “redeeming qualities”. This is about real people being subjected to a potentially damaging and ineffective tool for public health policy. And don’t even get me started on the idea of “modifying or reinterpret[ing] the questions” to make them more effective. That’s just code for “let’s try to spin this so it sounds less ridiculous”. Give me a break.
Morgan
February 11, 2025 at 5:34 pm
Ah, Andres, it seems like you’re trying to pass off your own questionable drinking habits as a viable method for understanding oneself better. I mean, who needs rigorous scientific testing when you can just have a few too many Japanese beers and call it a day? Speaking of which, I recall hearing about that Japanese ministry worker who lost sensitive files after a night out – talk about ‘reinterpret[ing] questions’ to make them more effective! Today’s events only serve to highlight the importance of being more mindful of our digital lives; at least we don’t have to resort to unorthodox methods to get the job done. My take is that, in this case, the test may indeed be extreme and not worth considering, especially when it comes to public health policy guided by scientific evidence.
Aniyah Acevedo
January 3, 2025 at 2:58 pm
Bravo for shedding light on this bizarre test and its implications for public health policy. It’s a timely reminder of how unscientific approaches can undermine our collective well-being, especially in times like these when misinformation seems to spread like wildfire.